When I posted my Quick Takes from last week, Thomas was one of my commenters and had some interesting comments. As I could tell from these two comments (here and here), he had much more experience with this than I did so I asked him if he wanted to do a guest post for me. We had a nice Twitter exchange to brainstorm some ideas yesterday and this is the guest post that resulted. If anyone else has life experience in this area and wants to do a guest post, email me — I’m jen at grace-filled dot net.

Here’s Thomas:

Hi, I’m Thomas from Listening for the Shepherd. I’m a 28 year old man living in Michigan. I’ve been married for one year and we do not have children yet. I’m a convert to the Catholic faith. I have an undergraduate degree in History and English linguistics. I work as a data analyst. My wife is in grad school. We have a nice suburban home, good cars, we give to charity, and we can afford to take vacations. I’m middle class now, but that’s very new to me. I was raised in poverty in America.

Jen asked me to post about my experiences growing up in poverty in America and to share a few suggestions on how to improve the system.

My Experience
My parents both came from poor families and by the time they were 17 years old, my parents had both dropped out of high school and married each other. My mom worked at McDonalds. I’m not sure what my dad was doing. He’s had so many different jobs I can never keep track. Whatever it was, the pay was lousy. I was born less than a year later.

My mom mostly stayed home to take care of me after I was born. My dad has bounced from one lousy dead-end job to another. We moved a lot. We mostly lived in apartments and trailers, but we also often lived all in one room at the home of a friend or relative, sometimes for years at a time. Eventually, we were always evicted. I changed schools 13 times, by my best calculations. That number doesn’t include switching schools within the same district due to getting older. We moved more often than that, not all the moves caused a change of school. Those changes involved five school districts, we went back and forth from one district to another a lot.

My family has never been on the streets, but there were many times when we didn’t really have a home. We were on food stamps for much of my childhood. They always ran short the final week of the month. Food stamps don’t cover toilet paper, and I can’t tell you how many different odd things I’ve had to wipe myself with. Most of my childhood healthcare has came from Medicaid. Sometimes a decent job came along and things were better for a while. My family did alright economically when I was in middle school, and it was then that I got my brother. If things had been better when I was in high school, I would have another sibling. (Fellow pro-lifers take note.)

My Suggestions
These are suggestions on how to improve the current system, not a drastic overhaul.

-All states should issue food stamp “debit cards” like Michigan. Monthly mailings is a waste of state resources, especially when many recipients move frequently. Having recipients go pick them up wastes their resources (gas, childcare, etc) as well as state resources, since someone has to be employed to hand them to the recipients if they’re picking them up, in dozens to hundreds of locations.

-Food stamps should not be disbursed only once a month. This leads to issues in many households the last week of the month. Also, fresh foods need to be purchased more often. I would recommend disbursal on during both the first and third weeks of the month. This more closely mirrors many bi-weekly paycheck schedules, and families are more accustomed to planning for two weeks.

-Food stamps should also cover some non-food items, like toilet paper, shampoo, dish soap, detergent, and other cleansers and toiletries. These are essential items for everyone. Children need them too, not just food. Jen and I discussed on Twitter that perhaps at least 80% of the allotted funds would have to go to fresh foods and the other 20% could go to approved non-food items and luxury foods (frozen dinners, chips, etc). This would promote budgeting (how much to toilet paper and how much to ice cream?) and healthy food consumption, without totally dictating diet. It would also cut down on wasteful spending at convenience stores, since only a small amount could be spent at them.

-The whole of welfare needs to have an attitude shift. people on welfare need to be treated like people who need help, not like criminals trying to scam somebody. There are people like that, but that’s a small portion. Also, treating people that way makes them more likely to act that way. Suppose someone on welfare makes $20 babysitting. Do you really think that they should receive $20 less in food stamps that month? How are they ever going to get ahead? Maybe they need that money to help catch up on their bills. Non-reliable sources of income shouldn’t count against the reliable source of assistance.

-Also, we should be slower to cut off benefits. If you’ve been on assistance a long time and you suddenly get a decent job, you’re not instantly going to be doing alright, especially since you probably have bills to catch up on and other needs you haven’t addressed in a while. Also, the newly hired are the first fired. It’s very common to loose a job in the first 90 days of employment. Insurance benefits also often don’t kick in until after 90 days. Welfare benefits should continue until at least a month after that point, perhaps at a lesser rate.

-Recipients should be able to easily update their information online, or over the phone. This would make it easier for them to keep up with the demanding “paperwork” associated with being on welfare, and it would also cut down on the need for caseworkers to meet with clients to do things that someone really shouldn’t have to paid to do. This would be aided if the government kept better centralized database records. When a caseworker enters someones name in their database, they should see their marital status and how many kids they have automatically. Why should (dated) paper certificates need to be brought in?

Note: Some might be concerned about such all-encompassing databases existing. I’m telling you they already do. Both the government and corporations have profiles on millions of people. We might as well use the information to make it easier to help people.

These are just a few ideas on how to better help people using the current system.

Thanks Thomas!

OK… let’s look at Cari’s comment on my Quick Takes:

I am so sorry that you have to shoulder this. I know how horrible it feels to not be able to feed your family on your own (we’ve been there, too). It’s something that you carry around all the time, like an actual weight you can feel.

So after reading your takes, I have to ask you this question: considering how degrading and ill-organized your experience with a government health care program is, how do you maintain faith that Obamacare will offer something better? Putting aside the questions of contraception and abortion, how can we look at something like WIC and VA hospitals, and the sorry state they’re in, and have faith that a universal, gigantic program like national healthcare will offer Americans a positive change?

I’m not trying to put anyone on the defensive, I am just honestly wondering. Between my husband and myself, we’ve had experience with a wide range of government services, from the DMV to social services offices (you know, “the welfare line”), and none of them have demonstrated even a minimum level of competence. I feel, from reading these takes of yours, that you probably share in this assessment. So how to we move from the model currently in practice, to a better one?

First thing: WIC isn’t in a sorry state. I did have that pissy nutritionist in Pomona but other than that, my experience has been largely positive. I think part of the reason it has succeeded for more than 30 years is that it is administered by the states and each county has their own setup with multiple offices around the county if it is a large or populous area like LA County or Sacramento County. If your experience has been different, please let me know so I can add your view to this conversation.

As far as your first question, Obamacare, thus far, has been mostly regulations on insurance companies to fix some of the abuses that were happening. I wish I could go back in time and scan some of the documents I had in 2002 and 2003 when we were having to buy our own insurance where my insurance rate was more than my husband’s and where there was a $400 monthly maternity rider on the policy if I wanted to get pregnant because a lot of people don’t believe me. Some of those problems (like the inequality of rates) have been fixed and a number of rules regarding women’s health like free preventative care in the form of annual exams and mammograms has been added. Inasmuch as I understand it, Obamacare would require Americans to have insurance but provide tax breaks to do so and create a national exchange in which people could purchase healthcare policies — we’re not going into something like the NHS in Great Britain. I haven’t read the entire piece of legislation (it’s on my to-do list) but that is what I understand from what I have read.

As far as how I have faith that this can offer a positive change, my answer is that it’s better than the situation we have now where people are declaring bankruptcy because of medical bills and people are having to choose between food and medication. I don’t have the gift of prophecy and all we can do is see where this road takes us. I wish I could say that things will all run perfectly and the forecasted problems won’t happen but I can’t say that with complete certainty.

One problem that I think we have in general with social programs is that they’re the first thing on the chopping block when there are money programs. We’re cutting funds to the VA and SNAP yet we’re expecting them to provide at the same level as we were before. For example, we’re coming out of two wars and we’re actually dealing with issues like PTSD that were just swept under the rug before the Vietnam War but the VA isn’t being adequately funded to deal with these issues. Because of the economic downturn, a lot of kids are dependent on school lunches in some cases as their only source of food. Yet, school lunch programs are usually one of the first things to get cut.

Another problem is that urban areas tend to have the most need for these programs and there’s only so much that can be done if they don’t have the money to hire staff. The DHHS in Sacramento, for example, basically does all the major social program stuff for the entire county of 1.4 million people. Could we maybe get a couple smaller offices in other parts of the county that could handle food stamps and Medicaid? I know we have a county services office in my small town but it doesn’t cover everything. The workers at the DHHS are overworked and overextended which is why it takes so much time to get things done. Comparing it to my tiny county in Montana, I looked up the local office of public assistance and found that there is one worker for 3 counties. This would probably be an issue… except we’re talking maybe 20,000 people total. In the large county next door, there are two offices with one on the Blackfeet reservation where there’s a huge amount of poverty.

Last problem I’ll highlight: we have an attitude in the USA that if people have problems and need assistance, they’re obviously not working hard enough and deserve it. This isn’t the case at all. I could claim it’s the Protestant work ethic but I don’t even think it comes from that either. I think it comes down to this (expressed beautifully by Stephen Colbert):

If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn??t help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we??ve got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don??t want to do it.

So how do we fix this? We need to actually fund the necessary programs instead of letting Congress vote themselves in a pay increase. Taxes need to be based on income and investment income needs to be taxed at the same rate as salaries are. (Yes, that was a blatant dig at Mitt Romney.) We need to elect Congressional representatives that can work with each other and not waste our time and money with ceremonial votes. (Yes, that was a blatant dig at the 33 times Obamacare has come up for repeal.) How do we do this? We have to all agree that our focus should be the common good and that it is a tenet in every religion that we take care of each other and for those with no spiritual beliefs, it’s the moral thing to do.

This is just scratching the surface of the problem and there are a whole glut of issues that would need to be addressed before it would even be solvable. My aim is basically to try to answer Cari’s questions as best I can with the knowledge and experience I have. I know there are people who disagree with me and I’m fine with that. How would you solve things? Leave me a comment or answer it on your own blog and leave me a link to your answer in my comments.

Tomorrow or Tuesday, I want to tackle the comment left for me on Friday by Thomas of Listening for the Shepherd because it offers some insight into some problems in the system.

Michelle, one of my Catholic chicas told me about the f-bomb party some Democrats threw for Cardinal Dolan on Twitter. This grieves my soul greatly. My first reaction when I saw the news story is not bloggable because Jesus doesn’t like it when I use those words to talk about His children. So I prayerfully and intentionally composed the following Facebook status which I’m sharing on Twitter and on here.

[I] would like to say this to those who tweeted f-bombs to Cardinal Dolan after his benediction:

Cardinal Dolan is deserving of our respect, not only because he is a cardinal nor because he is the head of the USCCB. He deserves our respect because he attended BOTH parties’ conventions, met pastorally with people from both sides, and made an effort to be congenial to President Obama despite the lawsuits going on over the HHS Mandate. He stood his ground in inviting the President to the Al Smith dinner even though he incurred the ire and wrath of a number of conservative Catholics for doing so. While I am not Catholic and I may not agree with every stance he has, I genuinely respect him because he is acting in a completely pastoral fashion in being congenial to those with whom he disagrees. Tweeting him f-bombs is juvenile and shows a complete lack of courtesy. To those who did that: learn some manners and learn from the example the Cardinal has set.

Seriously, I have mad respect for the Cardinal. I may not agree with him on some issues (fewer than some of you would think) but he does deserve the respect given to his office.