Metanoia Within

The Daily Telegraph: Gays must change, says archbishop

Here are some salient points:

The archbishop of Canterbury has told homosexuals that they need to change their behaviour if they are to be welcomed into the church, The Sunday Telegraph can reveal.

Rowan Williams has distanced himself from his one-time liberal support of gay relationships and stressed that the tradition and teaching of the Church has in no way been altered by the Anglican Communion’s consecration of its first openly homosexual bishop.

The declaration by the archbishop – rebutting the idea that homosexuals should be included in the church unconditionally – marks a significant development in the church’s crisis over homosexuals. According to liberal and homosexual campaigners, it confirmed their fears that the archbishop has become increasingly conservative – and sparked accusations that he has performed an “astonishing” U-turn over the homosexual issue.

The revelations came in a newspaper interview last week in which the archbishop denied that it was time for the church to accept homosexual relationships, suggesting that it should be welcoming rather than inclusive. “I don’t believe inclusion is a value in itself. Welcome is. We don’t say ‘Come in and we ask no questions’. I do believe conversion means conversion of habits, behaviours, ideas, emotions,” he told a Dutch journalist.

“Ethics is not a matter of a set of abstract rules, it is a matter of living the mind of Christ. That applies to sexual ethics.”

At the same time he tried to distance himself from a controversial essay he wrote 20 years ago, in which he defended same-sex love. “That was when I was a professor, to stimulate debate,” he claimed. “It did not generate much support and a lot of criticism – quite fairly on a number of points.”The archbishop said that he was determined to preserve the unity of the church from being destroyed by the warring factions in the gay crisis. He said he has backed a resolution which says that homosexual practice is incompatible with the Bible.

OK… my reason for posting this is not to talk about the gay issue or to debate whether or not homosexual relationships are a sin or not. (Hint: Comment-bombing me or flaming me regarding the subject will cause me to I.P. ban you and will put me in a foul mood, so I don’t recommend doing it.) If you want to know where I stand, feel free to surf my archives.

My reason for posting this is to point out what the archbishop said about conversion:

I do believe conversion means conversion of habits, behaviours, ideas, [and] emotions.

I muchly believe that this applies to every one of us regardless of gender, race, orientation, creed, whatever.
When we accept Christ (inasmuch as we can do so), we accept that our old life and our old lifestyle is dead and we determine that we are going to live our lives by God’s rules and not the rules of the world. I’m not saying that it’s easy — I’m saying that it’s what we are commanded to do. After all, if we live our new life in Christ while caught up in our old ruts of sin, what’s the point? It’s like injecting ourselves with the same disease again. We need to live as if we have been redeemed, casting off that which was tying us down before.

This doesn’t necessarily just apply to sexual sins — it applies to drug use, alcoholism, jealousy, anger, pride, lust, gluttony, gossip, and other sins which cause us to put something in place of God in our lives or cause us to destroy the lives of others. Sin is something that separates us from God and ALL of us are sinners.
(For those who want to snark and say that I’m saying this as one sitting comfortably in a pew, I’ll point out that I didn’t grow up in the church and am a convert. So… I do actually know the subject about which I speak.)

On the issue of welcome, EVERYONE should be welcome in the church. Christ died to save all of us, not just those sitting in the pews every Sunday and I think we as Christians need to keep that in mind. We are no better than anyone else — we just know where to go for help with our sin problem. It’s one of those things that I think we as the people of God around the world need to address and work on before we try to evangelize the world.

My Kingdom For Some Zantac!

(I am going to admit right here and now that I’m ripping this idea off from Sir Sours. After all… I’m religious not schizophrenic as Herr Pisco would say.)

Yo God… we need to discuss a few things.

Jen! So nice of you to talk to me at a time other than your daily devotions! By the way, you realize that you should ideally pray even when you’re not going through Sacred Space, right?

Point taken. Now what’s with this acid reflux? I’m asking you for health and strength and all good things and you’re giving me this stinkin’ acid.

Said stinkin’ acid is from the garlic bread you ate at 3 a.m. and the cans of soda you’ve consumed today. Have you ever thought about giving up soda for a reason other than Lent?

Ummm… did it last year and then you let my gallbladder become a dead lump of flesh so that I was living on clear liquids like ginger ale?

You know that I created you perfect and that included a gallbladder that was designed to fulfill a certain purpose. You’re the one who downed the McD’s as a child and all those carbs.

And you knit me in my mother’s womb and gave me the predisposition to high cholesterol. As for creating things perfect, why did you have to create rattlesnakes? I spent all morning terrified that I was going to step on one.

We’ll discuss the whole creation issue later and I recommend that you look at what I said to the last person who asked that question.

I know… read those chapters in Job. That’s very nice. Now onto the job front: am I going to be subbing this year? Do you happen to have any bright ideas about what you want me to do if that doesn’t work out?

Jen, have you not forgotten what Jeremiah told the Israelites when they were in Babylon? I’ll give you a hint: you quoted it to all your frosh in college.

OK… so you know the plans you have for me. Mind enlightening me as to what you’re gonna do? I mean… it would be *nice* to know and all.

Jen, Jen Jen. You need to learn to trust me. By the way, you need to go sing at both services tomorrow.

Are you going to give me good sleep and not keep me awake after I pray for sleep like you did last night so that I can be bright-eyed and bushy-tailed and not rip peoples’ heads off?

That’s up to you and your Coke addiction.

*rolls eyes* Fine, I’ll sing tomorrow but you’d better help me get sleep tonight without the use of pharmaceuticals or ethanol-based liquids!

Good khouria. By the way, keep up the intercessing on behalf of others. It builds character and shows others my love.

Will do. Amen and all that jazz.

“The Chronicles of Narnia”: The Good, The Bad, and the Cute

Jon got The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe from his sister for his birthday (which was last Friday) and so we watched it today. My thoughts:

The Good
[-] the casting — EXCELLENT, especially Lucy and Jadis
[-] the faithfulness to the book since it was pretty accurate
[-] the special effects
[-] the way the animals were portrayed, especially the fox and the beavers
[-] Aslan — Liam Neeson is da man!
[-] the costuming
[-] the way they did the scene where Aslan is sacrificed — very tasteful and very poigniant

The Bad
[-] the emotions stemming from the scene where Aslan is sacrificed — it was a struggle not to weep on my part
[-] the breaking of the stone table — could have been a louder sound
[-] the beginning part where they’re dropping bombs on London — wasn’t in the book though it wasn’t a badly done scene

The Cute
[-] the beavers!
[-] the fox
[-] pretty well all the animals
[-] Lucy!!!!

I didn’t cry during the sacrifice scene which was amazing — I’d been kind of hedging on watching the movie because I was afraid of the crying that would happen. The scene was also very tastefully done — both Jon and I were impressed. I also really caught the Biblical symbolism in the film — it was not overdone but if you knew the allegorical meaning behind the characters, you understood.

An Attempt at a Meaningful Entry

[+] It’s paining me that I can’t write long meaningful things like I used to do in 2003 and 2004.Â? I mean, I’m now home again and my life *is* interesting — I just haven’t been able to articulate a lot of things on here because after what happened last September, I’ve become more private about my life.

[+] My faith life lately has been exploring Orthodox Christianity and attempting to reconnect to my liturgical side since I am seriously missing liturgy.Â? There’s a part of me that wants to attend Anglican services agan (in Canada of course — Anglicans and Episcopalians don’t exactly exist here) if for no other reason than it’s what I imprinted on.Â? (Yes Pisco, I know I need to haul butt to DC and visit you.)

[+] I have been ignoring most media outlets other than Countdown lately as I’m sick of seeing people dying in Lebanon and I don’t really give a rat’s butt about the JonBenet case which was *already* overhyped.Â? The War in Iraq just depresses me and I have so little respect for the president that I don’t want to even see him speak.Â? Thank goodness for DVR technology which lets me flip through a TV program to the parts I want.Â? (In this case: ODDBALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Â? Oh yeah, and whoever happens to be the Worst Person in the World for that day in case it’s Bill O’Reilly.)

[+] I have decided that I have no desire to see Snakes on a Plane.Â? I’m terrified of snakes that have a shot at killing me (which sucks because we have rattlers around here) and the movie was overhyped.Â? Besides, I’m now in a place where I kinda have to fly so I don’t want to deal with the thought of cobras and pythons on my Alaska Airlines flight.