About Jen

Jen isn't quite sure when she lost her mind, but it is probably documented here on Meditatio. She blogs because the world needs her snark at all hours of the night... and she probably can't sleep anyway.

The Simple Woman’s Daybook: September 24, 2012

We’re taking a break from posting on the 47% today to do my Monday meme. Thomas of Listening for the Shepherd and I are chatting via Twitter so there should likely be a post tomorrow.

Simple Woman's Daybook

FOR TODAY September 24, 2012

Outside my window… sunny and in the low 80’s. I cannot wait for actual fall weather to get here.

I am thinking… about how to reform social services.

I am thankful… for Anna’s liver transplant. It took 2 years and 8 months for the transplant to come but it’s still an awesome thing.

In the kitchen… dishes to be done. I did make orzo this weekend though.

I am wearing… navy blue maternity shirt and Jon’s Left Behind shorts.

I am creating… an entry based on my convo with Thomas (eventually).

I am going… pray that Daniel will hold tight until I’m done with this entry.

I am reading… Bossypants by Tina Fey.

I am hoping… tomorrow is quieter than Tuesdays usually are around here.

I am looking forward to… the NCIS and NCIS: Los Angeles season premieres tomorrow night.

I am learning how hard it can be to type with a house panther on one’s wrists. (Yes Edda, I’m talking to you.)

Around the house… vacuuming to do among other things.

I am pondering… the feeling of claws in my flesh. (Edda, please let go of my stomach. Mommy doesn’t like it when you draw blood.)

A favorite quote for today… ??Love is not affectionate feeling, but a steady wish for the loved person’s ultimate good as far as it can be obtained.?? — C.S. Lewis

One of my favorite things… house panthers. (Edda totally told me to say that.)

A few plans for the rest of the week: Morning Prayer, season premieres on CBS, PECS training for Daniel, massage on Friday, and Run for Courage on Saturday.

Hosted by The Simple Woman’s Daybook

Regarding My Quick Takes on Being the 47% (III)

OK… let’s look at Cari’s comment on my Quick Takes:

I am so sorry that you have to shoulder this. I know how horrible it feels to not be able to feed your family on your own (we’ve been there, too). It’s something that you carry around all the time, like an actual weight you can feel.

So after reading your takes, I have to ask you this question: considering how degrading and ill-organized your experience with a government health care program is, how do you maintain faith that Obamacare will offer something better? Putting aside the questions of contraception and abortion, how can we look at something like WIC and VA hospitals, and the sorry state they’re in, and have faith that a universal, gigantic program like national healthcare will offer Americans a positive change?

I’m not trying to put anyone on the defensive, I am just honestly wondering. Between my husband and myself, we’ve had experience with a wide range of government services, from the DMV to social services offices (you know, “the welfare line”), and none of them have demonstrated even a minimum level of competence. I feel, from reading these takes of yours, that you probably share in this assessment. So how to we move from the model currently in practice, to a better one?

First thing: WIC isn’t in a sorry state. I did have that pissy nutritionist in Pomona but other than that, my experience has been largely positive. I think part of the reason it has succeeded for more than 30 years is that it is administered by the states and each county has their own setup with multiple offices around the county if it is a large or populous area like LA County or Sacramento County. If your experience has been different, please let me know so I can add your view to this conversation.

As far as your first question, Obamacare, thus far, has been mostly regulations on insurance companies to fix some of the abuses that were happening. I wish I could go back in time and scan some of the documents I had in 2002 and 2003 when we were having to buy our own insurance where my insurance rate was more than my husband’s and where there was a $400 monthly maternity rider on the policy if I wanted to get pregnant because a lot of people don’t believe me. Some of those problems (like the inequality of rates) have been fixed and a number of rules regarding women’s health like free preventative care in the form of annual exams and mammograms has been added. Inasmuch as I understand it, Obamacare would require Americans to have insurance but provide tax breaks to do so and create a national exchange in which people could purchase healthcare policies — we’re not going into something like the NHS in Great Britain. I haven’t read the entire piece of legislation (it’s on my to-do list) but that is what I understand from what I have read.

As far as how I have faith that this can offer a positive change, my answer is that it’s better than the situation we have now where people are declaring bankruptcy because of medical bills and people are having to choose between food and medication. I don’t have the gift of prophecy and all we can do is see where this road takes us. I wish I could say that things will all run perfectly and the forecasted problems won’t happen but I can’t say that with complete certainty.

One problem that I think we have in general with social programs is that they’re the first thing on the chopping block when there are money programs. We’re cutting funds to the VA and SNAP yet we’re expecting them to provide at the same level as we were before. For example, we’re coming out of two wars and we’re actually dealing with issues like PTSD that were just swept under the rug before the Vietnam War but the VA isn’t being adequately funded to deal with these issues. Because of the economic downturn, a lot of kids are dependent on school lunches in some cases as their only source of food. Yet, school lunch programs are usually one of the first things to get cut.

Another problem is that urban areas tend to have the most need for these programs and there’s only so much that can be done if they don’t have the money to hire staff. The DHHS in Sacramento, for example, basically does all the major social program stuff for the entire county of 1.4 million people. Could we maybe get a couple smaller offices in other parts of the county that could handle food stamps and Medicaid? I know we have a county services office in my small town but it doesn’t cover everything. The workers at the DHHS are overworked and overextended which is why it takes so much time to get things done. Comparing it to my tiny county in Montana, I looked up the local office of public assistance and found that there is one worker for 3 counties. This would probably be an issue… except we’re talking maybe 20,000 people total. In the large county next door, there are two offices with one on the Blackfeet reservation where there’s a huge amount of poverty.

Last problem I’ll highlight: we have an attitude in the USA that if people have problems and need assistance, they’re obviously not working hard enough and deserve it. This isn’t the case at all. I could claim it’s the Protestant work ethic but I don’t even think it comes from that either. I think it comes down to this (expressed beautifully by Stephen Colbert):

If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn??t help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we??ve got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don??t want to do it.

So how do we fix this? We need to actually fund the necessary programs instead of letting Congress vote themselves in a pay increase. Taxes need to be based on income and investment income needs to be taxed at the same rate as salaries are. (Yes, that was a blatant dig at Mitt Romney.) We need to elect Congressional representatives that can work with each other and not waste our time and money with ceremonial votes. (Yes, that was a blatant dig at the 33 times Obamacare has come up for repeal.) How do we do this? We have to all agree that our focus should be the common good and that it is a tenet in every religion that we take care of each other and for those with no spiritual beliefs, it’s the moral thing to do.

This is just scratching the surface of the problem and there are a whole glut of issues that would need to be addressed before it would even be solvable. My aim is basically to try to answer Cari’s questions as best I can with the knowledge and experience I have. I know there are people who disagree with me and I’m fine with that. How would you solve things? Leave me a comment or answer it on your own blog and leave me a link to your answer in my comments.

Tomorrow or Tuesday, I want to tackle the comment left for me on Friday by Thomas of Listening for the Shepherd because it offers some insight into some problems in the system.

Regarding My Quick Takes on Being the 47% (II)

I’m writing this while waiting for Daniel to wake up from his nap and also waiting for Jon and my evil twin to finish grilling my dinner. 🙂 Because of this, I’m saving Cari’s comment for tomorrow or Monday. Today, I wanted to talk about my experience with WIC because Cari references it in her comment.

My mother-in-law was one of the first women to go on WIC and I think it was with my husband (35) though I could be wrong — it could be with my sister-in-law (who is almost 30). Basically, it was created by Jimmy Carter as a way of helping a mother take care of her child. The idea was to remove a reason for the mother to abort her child so the checks are always in the name of the mother and not the boyfriend or father. You can apply when pregnant and the income threshold is 185% of the poverty level. The page with the list of state agencies is here.

I first applied in May 2010 when we were in southern California. I wish I’d been able to do a better search on which office was the closest because I ended up going to an office that was farther away from our apartment than I needed to. Also, I was usually the only white woman there which wasn’t a bad thing — just… not my usual experience. When I came in, I’d sign in and wait to be called. Daniel hated to sit still (he still hates it) so I’d stroller him around the office. They’d call me and measure him and then I’d see the nutritionist. Their chief nutritionist was a woman from Germany and I think she was so used to dealing with moms who knew nothing about nutrition and basic care of their children because she treated me like I was completely stupid. Daniel was severely underweight due to texture issues in his mouth (which is common with preemies who have been on ventilators) and she couldn’t understand why he wasn’t gaining weight. She would give me pamphlets on shakes made with ice cream that “kids like to eat” and I’d come back the next month to tell her that it didn’t work and that I couldn’t make him drink it. After my monthly (or so) fight with her, they’d print out checks for a month and make an appointment for me to come back.

When I went to the grocery store, I’d have a check with specified amounts of food on it like a gallon of milk, 16 oz. of whole grains, and 16 oz. of cheese. They give you a booklet that explains what you can and cannot use the checks for and when I first went to the WIC office, they showed me a video on what to do. When I’d check out, I’d separate the WIC items from the other things I was buying and the checkers would process the checks a certain way, making me show them my book to verify my signature. What they allow is different for pregnant women than it is for breastfeeding women (they’re big on breastfeeding) or for moms with kids of different ages.

When we moved up to northern California, it took awhile to get re-established with WIC because of Daniel’s hospital stay and the fact that my nutritionist in southern California was singularly unhelpful in giving me any idea of how to find my county office. The county office up here also is annoying when it comes to getting someone to answer the phone. Finally, I located it while I was out one day and made an appointment to come in with Daniel. That first appointment was just to get us set up in their system and they were completely chill with Daniel crawling around the room and getting into everything. The next month, I met with Nancy (one of the nutritionists) and she was just unbelievably wonderful. I had met with a pediatric nutritionist at UC Davis a few weeks earlier and Nancy wanted to hear everything they’d had to say. She helped me get things worked out to have WIC pay for a month of Pediasure while we worked through a home healthcare place to get Medicaid to pay and she even gave me some ideas on how to get him working on different textures.

The last year that I’ve dealt with WIC has been almost exactly like my appointment with Nancy — they’ve been patient about Daniel flipping out because he wants to get into things and after two appointments of Daniel tantruming, Nancy put something in the computer that allows me to come in without him as long as he stays within the bounds he needs to on the growth chart. They’ve altered checks to take out some of the milk because Daniel is on the Pediasure and also taken out the eggs because both Daniel and I are allergic to them. When I asked them why they weren’t forcing me to attend “class” like they did in southern California (a short lecture on stuff like introducing more vegetables and decreasing sugar in your child’s diet), they explained that Daniel was eating well and within good bounds on the growth chart so they weren’t going to make do that. At the appointment before Daniel started school, I asked about lunches and they gave me some ideas on what to pack that he might eat. It’s been like having my own personal nutritionists and it’s a complete change from my experience in southern California. The local office is walking distance from our parsonage and it’s clean and a place where I’d be OK with Daniel crawling on the floor. It’s cheerful-looking and the staff is wonderful. (They weren’t bad in southern California — it was just that nutritionist.)

I am an enthusiastic recommender of WIC because I honestly believe they do good things. Both offices I’ve dealt with have a social worker there some days to deal with things like food stamps, Medicaid, and other programs and I think they could also recommend a pediatrician to me if I needed one. Granted, there are experiences like the one I had in southern California but even that was at least somewhat helpful in that they still gave me the checks and it still helped out immensely with feeding all of us.

Anyone else have experience with WIC?

Regarding My Quick Takes on Being the 47% (I)

This is going to be a multi-part entry because there were a lot of comments that need to be addressed. I know that Cari’s comment needs to be its own post and it’s also early in the weekend so there may be other comments that need addressing.

The first thing I want to do is let you know what happened, what programs we’re still part of, and why.

2009: Daniel is born at 29.5 weeks. As we knew we’d be looking at a massive hospital bill for him, the NICU social worker advised us to file for SSI for him which would also make him eligible for Medicaid. Based on his birth weight (1 lb 15 oz.), he was also eligible for Social Security to write off whatever insurance did not cover of his NICU bill.

2010: We moved from Montana to California after Jon’s parish situation deteriorated. We went through our savings in about two months and ended up applying for WIC, food stamps, and Medicaid for the three of us. (We had lost Medicaid for Daniel when SSA discovered an error.) We were granted WIC but our caseworker screwed up on the food stamps and Medicaid. Jon eventually got a youth pastor position which helped a bit and started working for his parents. He also supply-preached and did funerals which also helped. (Funeral homes will frequently have pastors on-call in case a family doesn’t have a church but would like a religious funeral for their loved one.) In September, he was called to Metanoia as the interim pastor. Meanwhile, I applied for Healthy Families (California’s S-CHIP) and Medicaid for Daniel. Straight Medicaid was denied but they’d kick something in after something like $1300/month. Healthy Families was denied because you had to be without insurance for a specific period of time before you were eligible. (My mom, God bless her, paid our insurance premiums so that there would be no lapse in coverage — neither Daniel nor I could be without insurance and until last year, Daniel was uninsurable.) We also got hooked up with the Regional Center (California’s agency for developmental disabilities). In November, I reapplied for SSI for Daniel as his developmental delays qualified him.

2011: Jon was called to Metanoia full-time in January and we moved up to northern California in February. His income was still under the threshold for WIC so we transferred up here. A week and a half after moving up here, Daniel ended up in the hospital for three weeks. The hospital social workers hooked me up with California Childrens’ Services which required me to apply for Medicaid. We were granted Medicaid which would kick in after $500 in medical costs per month. Meanwhile, SSI chugged through and I had to go into the office in the town to the south of us and get that squared away. It took two months and learning how to harass the right people but Daniel finally got approved and we were granted retroactive SSI and retroactive Medicaid. California Childrens’ Services paid for his hematology appointments and his Lovenox while he still required shots and we got things transferred to the Regional Center up here who are the epitome of awesomeness. They covered physical/occupational/speech/infant program through Easter Seals and one independent contractor. Daniel’s clot (from his central line during his hospitalization in March) disappears and we’re able to be kicked out of the hematology practice and California Childrens’ Services.

2012: Daniel turns three which means that the local school district is now in charge of speech/occupational therapy. He is diagnosed with autism (thank you to the Regional Center for paying for the testing) and is in an ABA classroom. We’re still hooked up with the Regional Center and are trying to get an in-home program in place. We’re also still hooked up with WIC and will be until our income is higher than the threshold or until Daniel turns 5.

OK… onto addressing comments!

From Stacy (who, by the way, is a social worker and knows her stuff):

I get SO ANGRY when people talk about those who abuse the system. For every one person who is abusing it, I’m sure there are 100+ who aren’t. Not to mention that the system is set up for people to you know…. not really be able to get out of it! Sooo frustrating. On another note, our Medicaid/food stamp office is BEAUTIFUL. I’ve never seen anything like it but it makes me so happy that the people going there for help don’t have to feel like they need to go on antibacterials afterward.

Granted, I’m seriously mysophobic so the anti-bacterials are a given with me. However, part of the problem is that a number of programs are housed at the DPSS in Pomona and the DHHS in Sacramento and they’re both located in seriously urban areas so they get a lot of traffic. I think if I went at the moment they opened, it would be less nasty for me. (OK… I’ve actually done that with the DPSS and it was still nasty.) The WIC office I go to in northern California is beautiful and clean (and located within walking distance from me) so that’s actually a positive. The one in southern California was not bad but it was overused so it got yucky.

From Jen:

What??s sad/true is that you have to be somewhat well-educated/literate in English to be able to wade through the bureaucracy, including knowing where to get official documents, how to correctly fill out the forms, etc. My husband sees a lot of this in his line of work??with former incarcerated men trying to re-enter the community. They aren??t well educated, they don??t have certain common sense skills (like how to start looking for their birth certificate) and there??s little to no help in teaching them these types of things (that a lot of us take for granted), so it??s no wonder why many of them end up back in prison. Because it??s easier. The staff at the halfway houses and re-entry programs can only do so much to assist, but there??s not enough time, money, staff, etc. Vicious cycle.

Having done prison ministry, I can attest to this. A lot of the men I dealt with when I’d go into the local prison in Montana (a for-profit medium security prison housing inmates for the state of Montana) were from disadvantaged backgrounds so they were there after making some really bad decisions. I could totally see me going in and teaching a class in how to do all these things but I stopped going in after getting pregnant because of the potential to be taken hostage while in the prison. Granted, it’s not even the most intuitive process for those of us on the outside to do things like getting a copy of a marriage certificate because it requires knowing what county to contact and what’s needed to do so. I know it was really hard to get a copy of my birth certificate for a library card when I didn’t have a valid ID in Minnesota — I had to go to a parishioner who was a loan officer and had notary privileges to get stuff signed to make the request.

OK… heading to bed. Will write more tomorrow.

7 Quick Takes: Perks of Being Part of the 47%

7 Quick Takes

Unless you happen to live under a rock, you’ve probably heard about Mitt’s “47%” gaffe. I am a member of that 47% so… I figured that as I’ve not hit my political snark quota this year due to promising not to badmouth any Republican candidate, I’d have some snark time now. 🙂 Here are my “7 perks of being part of the 47%”.

Oh yes… please sponsor me in the Run for Courage and please go love on Brett, my Reece’s Rainbow orphan. Thanks!

**PREREQUISITE WARNING: I am being sarcastic. Leaving me hateful comments and sending me hatemail will result in you being I.P. banned. If you are incapable of being civil or refraining from using my combox as your personal soapbox, you might want to skip this post in favor of something more palatable. — The Management**

Continue reading

The Simple Woman’s Daybook: September 17, 2012

Simple Woman's Daybook

FOR TODAY September 17, 2012

Outside my window… hopefully cooling down. It’s the 16th straight day of 90F or above and in 4 days, we will have set a record.

I am thinking… that friends don’t let friends read bad Twilight fanfic. (50 Shades started out as a fanfic piece based on the Twilight books.)

I am thankful… that Jon brought me home a sandwich from Subway — even if I did have to fight the 4 furballs to eat it in peace. (3 guesses as to what was in the sandwich.)

In the kitchen… spinach salad with feta and a balsamic vinagrette for lunch today.

I am wearing… Old Navy flag shirt and running shorts.

I am going… to hope Daniel doesn’t flip out on my laptop before I finish this entry.

I am wondering… if I get geek cred for having the theme song to “The Big Bang Theory” memorized.

I am reading… Bossypants by Tina Fey. Because, you know, I’m so up on the latest trends. /sarcasm

I am hoping… to get some formatting done on the devotional book this week.

I am looking forward to… seeing my evil twin and hopefully my sister-in-law this weekend.

Around the house… *putting my fingers in my ears* I can’t hear you!

A favorite quote for today… ??We are not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be.?? — C.S. Lewis

One of my favorite things… sitting in a quiet chapel and listening to the birds sing.

A few plans for the rest of the week: Morning Prayer, working on the devotional book, and a barbeque with my evil twin and (hopefully!!!) my sister-in-law for the autumnal equinox.

Hosted by The Simple Woman’s Daybook

Something Not Quite Right About Us

My friend, the priest’s wife at Remnant of Remnant, did her Quick Takes this week on why she blogs and she brought up a comment made on her site about how there was “something not quite right with [her]” and how it must be because her husband is a “liberal”. (That’s probably the last thing I’d consider labeling her husband.) Actually, I think there is “something not quite right” about a lot of us in the religious realm who blog, especially when we already have a visible role in the community.

One paragraph in particular resonates with me:

Am I cool enough so that people can see the Church as a viable addition to their hipster lifestyles? Am I conservative enough so as not to scandalize a traditional person (well- the Sound of Music is out)? Am I Eastern enough so that my tradition is better understood? Am I Western enough so as not to alienate the majority of the readers? Does my part-timer job and use of a charter school make me a fake stay-at-home mom and homeschooler? Do the cheese crunchies in my pantry make me a hypocrite after I blogged about health? So, I am going to blog for myself as a sort of journal. I’m not not blogging for Jesus and the Church, but I don’t represent the entirety of the Church (of course) so I pray that all readers see my disclaimer of sorts at the top of the page- “Jesus Christ, Son of God- have mercy on me, a sinner.”

Elisabeta (as I am dubbing “priest’s wife” for the rest of this post because I have a deathly fear of too many apostrophes) and I both occupy a position in the community that is rather unique. She is the wife of a priest at several small Byzantine Cathiolic missions. She is Father ______’s wife and whatever she does reflects on him, whether it has to do with her daughters not covering their heads in worship or it has to do with how she deals with prickly people. By the same token, I’m not “Jen” to a lot of people — I’m “Pastor Jon’s wife” and while I am in a much bigger community than I have been in his last two parishes, people still know who I am the second they hear my (incredibly unique and hyphenated) last name. I represent his parish (which I refer to as “Metanoia” on this blog) and I have to be very mindful of this in public. This means that I have to be polite to everyone, even when I would honestly like to apply a cattle prod to women who stop in the middle of an aisle at the grocery store and block the way or when I’d like to use a specific finger to let drivers on Highway 99 know what I think of their driving habits. I *try* to be extra sweet to the checkers at the grocery store and to anyone else with whom I do business, lest someone say that “the pastor’s wife at Metanoia was rude to me!!!!” and I catch flak from the church council over it.

In terms of my blogging, this is actually a blog that none of my parishioners know about (as far as I know) and I could actually use it as my personal soapbox to excoriate people for everything I believe to be a sin. However, I also know that I represent Christianity to a lot of non-Christians and Lutheranism to many believers. I could tell people that this is my own personal little haven and to find another blog if they can’t take what I dish out. Unfortunately, I seem to be somewhat of an anomaly as one who came to faith as an Episcopalian, hung out with Baptists in college, and now is married to a Lutheran pastor. I find my own company to be a bit boring so I welcome everyone who wants to come read this blog. I have never claimed this as a “Christian blog” — instead, I claim to be a blogger who is Christian and this means that those who leave comments are going to (hopefully) have a diversity of backgrounds and opinions. Having a diversity of readers is great because it means that I get a diversity of viewpoints on issues but I also have to remember that if I claim to be Christian, I have to act like it. Instead of mocking commenters with whom I disagree or being condescending, I need to either quietly delete their comments (which usually go to moderation) or be charitable.

Elisabeta and I have both dealt with criticism of ourselves via our blogs and while I can’t speak for her, I know it still rips me apart when someone very nastily criticizes me or criticizes something on my blog. For me, my blog is an extension of me — it’s where I work out a lot of things that are central to my life. I’ve also found that in this election year, people seem to be looking for a fight so anything I say on here can be used in a fight. I think this is something that makes it difficult for me (and probably for Elisabeta) to be a clergy wife — there are a lot of times when we have to smile and nod politely instead of saying what might actually be on our minds. By blogging, both of us are putting more of ourselves “out there” and we are creating even more opportunities for people to criticize us. By doing it, we also create community for ourselves. It was The Simple Woman’s Daybook that started our friendship and I’ve “met” another clergy wife through her.

So yes, there is “something not quite right” about ourselves — in “working out our salvation with fear and trembling” by blogging, we are constantly trying to find a balance between transparency and anonymity. We are setting ourselves up for people to tell us that we aren’t ________ enough but we are also unintentionally representing our faith traditions. In short, we are living out the lives God has ordained us to live and taking all of you along for the ride.