[the site that must not be named] still has the link to /narnia up and I’m getting a little irritated since I want this domain disassociated from [the site that must not be named]. I emailed the webmaster and asked him to take my link off of his site. It’s removing a few lines of HTML coding — it isn’t that hard! What irritates me most is that it was done in defiance. The reference is just http://peacefulwaters.org/narnia — no description or even an effort to mention the name, making me think it was done kind of carelessly. I also emailed the routers, since their the ones that bring the site into the US.
And yes, I know I’m being a bit of a bitch (the hours are good and there’s no heavy lifting) but… I feel like I should have the freedom to post what I need in order to deal with my life without having my words used to hock trendy kitsch.
you tell them, sister!
Jen,
My old URL is still up there and I haven’t used it for months. Shows how much attention is paid to their links if they don’t weed out blogs that haven’t had an update in months and months. Perhaps it’s a bit like “bums on seats???”
Shalom,
jan
Dear Jen,
Just what at that site do you think is trendy? Meds have you messed up.
-Peace
I don’t think you’re being a bitch at all. it’s kinda like if you were being linked from a porn site… you have the right to not be associated with any site you choose.
Watch your mouth, Dave – trendy stuff is bad; comments about meds are even worse.
🙂
It was ment to be toung in cheek. Cause trendy is at least cool to some people, that site is just plain bad. I’d hate to think it represented a trend anywhere.
When I’ve been on pain killers I’ve found it messes me up.
-Peace
I don’t mean to cause offense – but does that mean you should always ask permission to link to someone when you put a link on your site? That would certainly make blogging a fairly long and laborious task….
just a question