A Possible Solution to the HHS Mandate Sitch

On my Quick Takes this week, I had the following to say:

I heard about Franciscan University’s insurance plan for next year. (The gist of it: the terms of the mandate require them to cover contraception and other parts of the mandate would make it too expensive.) I think the best way to put this is “cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face”. There are a number of ways that Franciscan could work around the mandate that would not require them to cover contraception. Having a community covenant not to contracept comes to mind as an example. Just look at schools like Liberty University, Cedarville University, and other conservative Christian colleges which have certain standards to which students must abide in order to maintain enrollment. Having something in writing that the student will not contracept in order to stay enrolled wouldn’t be that hard. I also wonder why someone would be attending a school like Franciscan if one wasn’t willing to live according to the teachings of the Magisterium so I’m not even sure that you’d find many students that would contracept there.

There are two suggestions I’d make that could solve this.

Community Covenant
If you were to go onto the website of a school like Cedarville University in Ohio and could actually *find* their student handbook (it was pretty hard to find), you’d see a few interesting things.

01.) Required daily chapel for *everyone*. No exceptions.
02.) Dress code rules for classes and activities. (It has relaxed considerably in the last 11 years. Girls used to have to wear skirts or dresses to class.)
03.) Required Biblical Studies minor along with whatever major you have.
(All this is based on the testimony of the Cedarville students I roomed with at Urbana and the school website at that time.)

If you looked at a number of conservative Christian colleges around the country, you’d find similar things though the chapel requirements are less and there usually isn’t a dress code. Why am I bringing this up? Cedarville has a community covenant that the students have to agree to in order to attend and it includes things like church attendance on Sunday morning/evening and Wednesday evening, the dress code, certain conduct like not drinking, and other things that set the school apart from other schools in the area and in Ohio.

If Cedarville can do this, is there any reason Franciscan couldn’t do something similar and write provisions for the sanctity of life into theirs, with one of them being that students don’t contracept? It would make the HHS mandate moot because no student would be contracepting if they wanted to remain in good standing with the school. It wouldn’t matter if they were Catholic or not — it would be part of the community covenant that students agree to abide by in order to stay enrolled.

Churchwide Insurance Plan
The Catholic Church is the largest single Christian group in the U.S. A number of politicians across the board claim to be Catholic and the Church does have some sway on policy. In dealing with the HHS Mandate and the problems of conscience that arise, one issue is that the Church doesn’t qualify for an exemption because the scope of the mandate isn’t broad enough. The rest of us clergy and ministries can get exemptions because we’re covered under denominational insurance plans which are specific to our denomination.

One solution (which has a better chance of working than making the Obama administration change) is to create a churchwide insurance plan. There is already a Catholic fraternal organization which deals in life insurance/long-term care insurance/retirement — the Knights of Columbus — so why not use the knowledge of the KoC and create a churchwide healthcare plan that people could buy into?

The benefits:
01.) You’d have so many members that it would lower rates. The reason corporations like UPS can offer fantastic benefits is that they’ve got 80,000 employees. Ditto with a denomination like the ELCA which had *fabulous* benefits for clergy and their families that I miss terribly. If the Catholic Church had its own insurance plan (which could be administered by someone like Aetna or Blue Cross/Blue Shield), it would be the largest in the country and could offer better rates than *anyone* else.
02.) You’d be able to specify no contraception, no abortiofacients, etc. As the insurer of your religious organizations, you’d be able to specify what you could not cover for religious reasons. This would qualify for an exemption for religious purposes.
03.) As the largest insurer in the country, you’d have a pretty decent voice in healthcare policy. If you’re insuring millions of people and providing affordable/comprehensive care, insurance companies are going to be listening because, dude, they’ll want to do business with you. The insurance industry is not non-profit by any stretch of the imagination. (It’s partially why costs are so exorbitant but that’s another rant for another time.)

So is the Church going to start its own insurance program? Probably not. That’s for the USCCB to decide and this little Lutheran doesn’t have their ear. The community covenant at Franciscan is workable though.

Why yes, I know I’m not Catholic. However, I’ve rarely seen Catholic bloggers hold their tongues when it comes to things happening with Protestants; and instead of just criticizing Franciscan for their policy, I’m actually making a valid suggestion as to how to fix it.

7 Quick Takes: Voicing My Thoughts

7 Quick Takes

For a change this week, I thought I’d do my Quick Takes as an audio file. Click on the “Continue reading ->” to see the text of them.

Oh yes… comments regarding Quick Take #2 can be left here. Anything about it (other than unfettered praise) left on this entry will be either edited or deleted.

Continue reading

The Simple Woman: May 9, 2012

Simple Woman's Daybook

FOR TODAY May 9, 2012

Outside my window… it’s in the 90’s… which is, like, 10-15 degrees hotter than it should be. I hate heat. *grumps*

I am thinking… that people who don’t vote have no business complaining about the way things are.

I am thankful… that Daniel gets tired enough at school to nap.

In the kitchen… looking through the cupboard for my dinner. If I can’t find anything, I’ll do quesadillas.

I am wearing… blue maternity shirt and plaid boxer shorts.

I am creating… this entry among other things.

I am going… to mail in my absentee ballot tomorrow. (We got them today.)

I am wondering… how some of the people on the ballot think they’re going to win.

I am reading… still Style, Sex, and Substance ed. by Hallie Lord. I did read two murder mysteries over the weekend — The Gingerbread Bump-Off by Livia J. Washburn and Marriage is Murder by Nancy Pickard.

I am hoping… my neck stops spasming and the pain goes away. (My neck is the main reason why this entry is two days late.)

Around the house… still relatively clean but there are serious dishes needing to be done.

One of my favorite things… air conditioning. Enough said.

A few plans for the rest of the week: possibly Bible study tomorrow morning and possibly a vet appointment or two for my cats.

A peek into my day… Daniel helping with laundry two weeks ago. He’s so helpful.

Daniel helping with laundry

Hosted by The Simple Woman’s Daybook

Rosen vs. Romney

NOTE: I’m blogging to add my two cents on the whole dust-up and not to compare the merits of Romney as a candidate vs. Obama or Ron Paul or anything else. My commitment not to trash any of the candidates stands firm.

I’m sure this is going to be a SHOCKER but I agree that Hillary Rosen misspoke in saying that Ann Romney “never worked a day in her life.” Why, pray tell, do I agree?

1.) The way she phrased it made it sound to some like she was assuming that stay-at-home mothers don’t work. (Huh. I didn’t construe it that way and neither did a number of people I know.) What she probably intended to say was that Ann Romney had never worked a day outside the home in her life. Funny that I somehow figured that out when the mainstream media couldn’t…

2.) It is considered really bad manners to attack a candidate’s family. I mean, you can question whether or not Romney is correct in relying on Ann for advice on women and finances, but it is unfair to attack Ann Romney herself or to attack their kids. The same thing goes for Michelle, Malia, and Sasha — you can criticize President Obama and his policies but you sound really rude when you go after Michelle and the girls.

In the interest of being fair, Hillary Rosen did have a valid point in that Romney should probably be receiving advice on his policies on women from a female campaign staffer who is working full-time and raising her kids without the aid of a housekeepers and nannies like Ann Romney had. You could bring up her MS but then you’d have to bring up the fact that there are hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of women in this country who work full-time and raise their kids while simultaneously dealing with autoimmune diseases like lupus, MS, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia (the one I deal with on a daily basis).

According to just about every major news source, Rosen apologized and Romney graciously accepted her apology. Can we stop hating on her now?

11 Things

Ann of House of Estrogen tagged me in this meme going around the Internet. Whee!

Rules
1.) The first rule is to post these rules.
2.) Post a photo of yourself then write 11 things about you/your life.
3.) Answer the questions for you set in the original post.
4.) Create 11 new questions and tag people to answer them.
5.) Go to their blog/twitter to tell them you have tagged them.

OK… so let me find a picture I like.

Me after a haircut

OK… 11 things about me.

01.) I’m a night owl. I get most of my blogging done after 9 p.m.
02.) I’m 5’1 on a bad hair day. People tell me that I seem taller online.
03.) I’m incredibly shy and very introverted. I’d prefer to people-watch rather than socialize.
04.) I have a weird accent that makes me sound like a valley girl Canadian. It makes it really hilarious when I switch into academic mode and I’m using polysyllabic words while sounding like I should be on a beach in southern California tanning myself.
05.) I graduated from college in 3 years. I’m not smart — just strategic. The fact that I was sick of being in a long-distance relationship also didn’t hurt.
06.) I read murder mysteries for fun. I’m currently reading Buried in Buttercream by G.A. McKevitt.
07.) I have part of a Masters in Theological Studies. I’m incredibly good at it but theology in general bores me. I’m more of a historian and linguist.
08.) I’ve been singing Handel’s Messiah since I was 15. It was a holiday tradition for my mom and I throughout high school and college to do the You-Sing-It-Messiah with the San Jose Symphonic Choir.
09.) I love t-shirts with interesting messages. I love my We Will Not Be Silent shirt and am heartbroken that I’m having to replace it.
10.) My promise not to blog on the Republican candidates is grating on me. There’s SOOOOOOOO much snark I want to post!!!!!!
11.) I’m a princess darnit!

OK… my questions to answer!

1.) What is your favorite movie? It varies. I like the classic Disney cartoons like “The Aristocats” and “The Sword and the Stone” as well as “Forrest Gump”, “The Birdcage”, “The Spitfire Grill”, “Whale Rider”, and “Saved”.

2.) If you could go back and give your 16 year old self one piece of advice, what would it be? Stop worrying about what people will think and join a church. (I’m a convert to Christianity.)

3.) Why do you blog? So many reasons. Generally, I do it because it’s cheaper than therapy and I’ve made so many friends doing it. It also was my way of accessing the outside world when I lived in remote areas of the US.

4.) What did you want to be when you grew up? Are you doing that? I wanted to be a lawyer until I was 15 when I started wanting to be a doctor. I’m not doing either though I’m discerning doing training as a respiratory therapist because they’ve been the coolest health professionals that I’ve encountered in my own adventures and with Daniel.

5.) M&M’s – plain or peanut? Coconut.

6.) What was your first car? 1984 Volvo 240 GL.

7.) What is your favorite Halloween costume you’ve ever worn? The cat costume my mom made us when we were 3.

8.) What are your favorite blogs to read? I have at least 30-40 in my feed reader. They range from Canadian pastors to young Catholic women to Mormon housewives. Most blogs these day happen to be mommy blogs because all my bloggy friends have kids.

9.) If you were to have a boy and a girl tomorrow, what would you name them? Aidan Michael and Hannah Grace.

10.) What was your favorite class in college? Women’s Chorale, my advisor’s history classes, Religion and Social Change, Science and Human Values, the Making of the Modern Middle East, my Organic Chemistry labs, and my college’s Core course.

11.) What celebrity do you think it would be fun to be friends with? Definitely Pauley Perette (Abby on NCIS). She’s very much in person like she is on TV and she’s also incredibly socially conscious. I also love anyone who can pull off the goth look over the age of 30. (She’s in her 40’s.)

OK… now my questions!

01.) What food would you never eat even if you were paid to eat it?
02.) What is your favorite Bible verse or quote?
03.) Should jello at church be in the proper liturgical color?
04.) What was your high school or college mascot?
05.) What do you wish you could do?
06.) What book should everyone read?
07.) What is the weirdest thing you’ve eaten?
08.) Pretend I magically arrived on your doorstep. How would we spend your ideal day?
09.) Manicure or pedicure?
10.) What is the best type of ethnic food (i.e. Italian, Japanese, Indonesian)?
11.) Grey or orange tabby cats?

Now for the tagging!

Beth @ The Catholic Couponer

Nikkiana @ Authentic Experience

Kate @ ImperfectKate

Kathleen @ So Much to Say…

The Preoteasa @ Fear Not Little Flock

Dawn @ ladydusk

I know all of you have lives and such. Please find a way to mold this meme to your blog. If you can’t post a picture of yourself, post one of your kids or something that represents you.

Using Our Tongues Appropriately

We’ve all heard the firestorm over Rush Limbaugh calling law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” and claiming that she pays for sex because she testified in favor of birth control pills. I’ve seen various commentaries on this including this one from Sandi Villareal, the associate web editor for Sojourners.

I also saw this piece of news on Twitter last night. Summing it up, Bill Maher called Sarah Palin a “cunt” in his comedic routine and apparently “the left” let it slide even though it’s equally as offensive as Rush Limbaugh’s remarks.

Can I speak as one of the “left” in calling Bill Maher out for saying it? I mean, I’m not one of the “left” per se (I want to say that I’m “the center”) but I still think it was wrong of him.

My question is why we’re coming down like a ton of bricks on Limbaugh for what he said while we’re effectively giving Maher a free pass? Is it because it was said in the context of a “comedy routine” which Limbaugh’s rantings could argued be classified as being? We’ve gotten all hot and bothered about other comedians making racist remarks in their sets before so why is this any different? I am no fan of Sarah Palin and would love it if she disappeared from the public sphere but I still cannot think that Maher’s comments were acceptable. Is it because Maher has a beef with religion and Limbaugh professes to believe in something that we’re holding Limbaugh to a higher standard?

James 3 yields some interesting wisdom:

My brethren, let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment. For we all stumble in many things. If anyone does not stumble in word, he is a perfect man, able also to bridle the whole body. Indeed, we put bits in horses?? mouths that they may obey us, and we turn their whole body. Look also at ships: although they are so large and are driven by fierce winds, they are turned by a very small rudder wherever the pilot desires. Even so the tongue is a little member and boasts great things.

See how great a forest a little fire kindles! And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity. The tongue is so set among our members that it defiles the whole body, and sets on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire by hell. For every kind of beast and bird, of reptile and creature of the sea, is tamed and has been tamed by mankind. But no man can tame the tongue. It is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. With it we bless our God and Father, and with it we curse men, who have been made in the similitude of God. Out of the same mouth proceed blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not to be so. Does a spring send forth fresh water and bitter from the same opening? Can a fig tree, my brethren, bear olives, or a grapevine bear figs? Thus no spring yields both salt water and fresh.
–James 3:1-12 (NJKV) emphasis mine.

Our tongues enable us to speak out against injustice but they can also land us in hot water as we make snide and unnecessary comments about people. Verses 8-10 are the ones I emphasized in the passage because our tongues are full of deadly poison (v.8), we use it for two diametrically-opposed purposes of blessing God and cursing others (v.9), and that it should not be so (v.10). I understand that this is politics and that trash talk is the norm but it should not be acceptable to demean each other in this way.

Tim King ended his article (my fodder for discussion yesterday) by telling the politicos to “stop talking … Spend some time in prayer and think about what you say before you say it. Ask yourself, is the political gain, the next spot on cable news or the notoriety I can achieve really worth the damage to the church?” Sandi Villareal ends hers very simply with this quotation from Psalm 19:

Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart
Be acceptable in Your sight,
O Lord, my strength and my Redeemer.
–Psalm 19:14 (NKJV)

I think both serve as a reminder to consider that what we say has a power that transcends mere words, especially if we happen to be a public figure.

Hypocrisy: Killing the Faith One Example at a Time

Soujourners Magazine: Don’t Blame College for Young People Leaving the Church

I saw a link to this on Facebook on Wednesday and thought it might be interesting. It definitely was very eye-opening and affirms the trend I saw in college — young people leaving the church because of hypocrisy on the part of its members. Tim King, Director of Communications for Sojourners and author of the article has this to say:

An entire generation, my generation, is leaving the church. What??s the cause? Santorum blames higher education, telling Glenn Beck last week that “62 percent of kids who go into college with a faith commitment leave without it.”

The ??war on religion?? has become a frequent bogeyman among Christian and political leaders. But the reason church leaders have failed to stem the tide of a generation heading for the exit door is that they keep looking for an outside enemy to blame when the biggest problems are inside the church.

The years young adults spend in college aren??t causing them to leave their faith; those college years are exposing the problems with the faith they grew up with.

The exodus has little to do with liberal college professors, which insurance plans should cover contraception, where mosques are being built, or whether or not the Ten Commandments are hanging in courtrooms, even if many religious leaders act as if these are the greatest Christian ??battles?? of our lifetime.

In doing so, they are actively pushing young people away from religion.

Don??t get me wrong. I don??t think young people are leaving the church in record numbers just because some Christians are Republicans. There are a lot of wonderful Christians who happen to be conservative and who are great witnesses for the faith. Many of them are in my family.

Rather, the exodus is about hypocrisy.

Last year, we saw Christian leaders raising the alarm about the encroachment of ??radical Islamists.?? They call for the restriction of Muslims religious liberties to practice their faith and build houses of worship. But this year, when it comes to contraception, the rallying cry is religious freedom.

Last week, Franklin Graham was asked whether or not he believed President Obama was a Christian. He gave a fair answer when he said it wasn??t his place to judge.

But when asked the same question about the faith of Santorum and Newt Gingrich, Graham??s standards changed. He answered that yes, he did think those men were Christian because of ??political interests?? and ??spiritual interests.?? Graham later backtracked, but the message was already out.

What did a lot of young people hear? To be a Christian you need to look like, talk like and vote like Franklin Graham?? Oh, and something about sinners and grace.

What King neglected to add was that Franklin Graham said that President Obama could be a Muslim because “Muslims have gotten a free pass under his administration”. Has everyone forgotten Obama’s “pastor problem” in 2008? Does the name Jeremiah Wright ring a bell?

I have said that I would keep my mouth shut regarding the president’s GOP challengers and I will just say that Obama’s moral character has not been called into question the same way that former Speaker Gingrich’s character has.

Anyway, it is a valid point that it fails to keep young people in the church when they hear nothing but trash talk from their church members and then the pastor who has been engaging in the trash talk preaches them a sermon on Romans 13:1. It states: “Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God.”

King has more to say:

Such political spectacles are driving a generation away from faith. It almost did for me, an evangelical Christian in my 20s who attends church on an almost weekly basis.

Most of my life I went to private Christian schools or was homeschooled. I had some wonderful examples of faith that inspired me. But as soon as I heard Christians on the radio or saw them on TV, I was ashamed to call myself a Christian.

The Jesus I read about in Scriptures taught love, acceptance, peace and concern for the poor, but the Christian leaders on TV and radio always seemed to be pro-rich, pro-white, pro-America and anti-gay.

By college I was getting ready to leave it all behind.

Thankfully, I had found meaning in work with the homeless and tutoring refugees. I heard Jim Wallis, for whom I now work, speak about God??s heart for the poor and oppressed. I sat in Scot McKnight??s North Park University classes in Chicago and learned about a Jesus who didn??t think like me, talk like me or live like me but who presented a radical challenge to be a disciple of this one they call Christ.

By 2004, I realized that the highest Christian calling in my life might not be to vote Republican. I still casted my ballot, but what was most significant to me that November was inviting 15 homeless men and women into my campus apartment to celebrate Thanksgiving with some other students and spend the night indoors.

I like politics. I think it??s important. Public policy matters because it affects people??s lives every day in ways we often don??t realize. But my primary concern for it comes because it affects the people Jesus called me to love and that the Bible tells me to be a voice for. This is why the use and abuse of religion during this election season is so troubling.

When Franklin Graham sets up double standards of faith for Republicans and Democrats, when Pat Robertson intones about a coming ??secular atheist dictatorship,?? when the Family Research Council??s Tony Perkins goes off about the dangers of repealing Don??t Ask Don??t Tell and other ??anti-family, anti-religious, anti-Christian policies,?? when the great test for the next President of our country is who has ??real?? theology and who has ??phony?? theology, it might make for good sound bites.

But it??s bad faith.

Blaming colleges, like Santorum did, is a lot easier than reforming the church. Finding an enemy outside of your religious faith might keep some young people in line for a little while and is probably great for fundraising. Heck, it might even mobilize an important voting bloc and win a few elections.

But it??s hastening the decline of Christianity for an entire generation.

I’ve heard it said that Christianity is one generation away from extinction. I also deal with the assumption that all young people want is contemporary music and entertainment. I have news for you: what young people want is something that is genuine and real. Yes, something from Hillsong might sound nice but a church with childcare so that parents can attend worship says a lot more. A church that genuinely loves EVERY generation and gives a voice to everyone is a lot more real than a mega-church like Joel Osteen’s where it’s just people worshipping a cult of personality.

What does it say about peoples’ perspective of the Christian faith when I mentally have to prepare to explain that I’m “not like _________ who just appeared on the Sunday morning political shows and talked about how __________ is waging a war on religion and the American identity”? What does it say when my tongue is bleeding because someone at church is going off on how evil [insert group of people] are when in reality I have friends from that culture but it would be inadvisable for me to speak up and risk offending one of the people who are responsible for my husband’s paycheck?

I love King’s closing:

I have a simple request for our nation??s religious leaders who keep finding ??enemies of the faith?? at every turn without ever looking inward. For Christ??s sake, stop talking.

Spend some time in prayer and think about what you say before you say it. Ask yourself, is the political gain, the next spot on cable news or the notoriety I can achieve really worth the damage to the church?

Well played. Perhaps if people realized the power of their words, their speech might be more measured.